merge-script 6d625af283 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32621: contrib: utxo_to_sqlite.py: add option to store txid/spk as BLOBs
7378f27b4f test: run utxo-to-sqlite script test with spk/txid format option combinations (Sebastian Falbesoner)
b30fca7498 contrib: utxo_to_sqlite.py: add options to store txid/spk as BLOBs (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  This PR is a late follow-up to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27432, introducing an option for the utxo-to-sqlite script to store the txid/scriptPubKey columns as bytes (= `BLOB` storage class in sqlite, see e.g. https://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html in sqlite) rather than hex strings. This was proposed in earlier reviews (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27432#issuecomment-1516857024, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27432#issuecomment-1653739351) and has the obvious advantage of a significantly smaller size of the resulting database (and with that, faster conversion) and the avoidance of hex-to-bytes conversion for further processing of the data [1]. The rationale on why hex strings were chosen back then (and still stays the default, if only for compatibility reasons) is laid out in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27432#issuecomment-1516922824 [2].

  The approach taken is introducing new parameters `--spk` and `--txid` which can either have the values "hex", "raw" (for scriptpubkey) and "hex", "raw", "rawle" (for txid). Thanks to ajtowns for providing this suggestion. Happy to take further inputs on naming and thoughts on future extensibility etc.

  [1] For a concrete example, I found that having these columns as bytes would be nice while working on a SwiftSync hints generator tool (https://github.com/theStack/swiftsync-hints-gen), which takes the result of the utxo-to-sqlite tool as input.
  [2] note that in contrast what I wrote back then, I think there is no ambiguity on byte-string-serialization of txids; they are ultimately just hash results and hence, they should be stored as such, and adding a big/little endian knob wouldn't make much sense. The drawback of not being able to immediately show txid-strings (as one would need to do the bytes-reversal step first, which is not possible in sqlite, see e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24952#issuecomment-1165499803) still remains though.

ACKs for top commit:
  ajtowns:
    ACK 7378f27b4f
  w0xlt:
    reACK 7378f27b4f
  sedited:
    ACK 7378f27b4f

Tree-SHA512: 265991a1f00e3d69e06dd9adc34684720affd416042789db2d76226e4b31cf20adc433a74d14140f17739707dee57e6703f72c20bd0f8dd08b6d383d3f28b450
2026-02-08 10:37:45 +01:00
2026-02-06 13:40:59 +00:00
2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
2025-12-29 17:50:43 +00:00
2025-06-19 11:22:14 +01:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/license/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py (assuming build is your build directory).

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is tested on Windows, Linux, and macOS. The CI must pass on all commits before merge to avoid unrelated CI failures on new pull requests.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Languages
C++ 65%
Python 19%
C 12.2%
CMake 1.3%
Shell 0.8%
Other 1.6%