baa3ddc49c doc: add release notes about `getreceivedbylabel` returning an error if the label is not in the address book. (furszy)
8897a21658 rpc: getreceivedbylabel, don't loop over the entire wallet txs map if no destinations were found for the input label. (furszy)
Pull request description:
Built on top of #23662, coming from comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23662#pullrequestreview-971407999.
If `wallet.GetLabelAddresses()` returns an empty vector (the wallet does not have stored destinations with that label in the addressbook) or if none of the returned destinations are from the wallet, we can return the function right away.
Otherwise, we are walking through all the wallet txs + outputs for no reason (`output_scripts` is empty).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK baa3ddc49c
theStack:
re-ACK baa3ddc49c
w0xlt:
ACK baa3ddc49c
Tree-SHA512: 00e10365b179bf008da2f3ef8fbb3ee04a330426374020e3f2d0151b16991baba4ef2b944e4659452f3e4d6cb20f128d0918ddf0453933a25a4d9fd8414a1911
23.x was forked off, release notes on master should be empty.
Tree-SHA512: 0b48006073302b7b1c7602b4843d3a3048e88f357fb7049e478ec946f12eb16ca813272e719e47de5fb9713984ccf59551372a7ccd7ced7afaac6b5f5687d78b
0eea83a85e scripted-diff: rename `proxyType` to `Proxy` (Vasil Dimov)
e53a8505db net: respect -onlynet= when making outbound connections (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Do not make outbound connections to hosts which belong to a network
which is restricted by `-onlynet`.
This applies to hosts that are automatically chosen to connect to and to
anchors.
This does not apply to hosts given to `-connect`, `-addnode`,
`addnode` RPC, dns seeds, `-seednode`.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/13378
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22647
Supersedes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22651
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 0eea83a85e
prayank23:
reACK 0eea83a85e
jonatack:
ACK 0eea83a85e code review, rebased to master, debug built, and did some manual testing with various config options on signet
Tree-SHA512: 37d68b449dd6d2715843fc84d85f48fa2508be40ea105a7f4a28443b318d0b6bd39e3b2ca2a6186f2913836adf08d91038a8b142928e1282130f39ac81aa741b
059f88b6a9 Add RPC help for getblock verbosity level 3 (Kiminuo)
1bdd5f6322 Address review comments from #22918 (Kiminuo)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up PR to #22918 which addresses review comments (first commit). The second commit adds missing RPC help for verbosity level 3.
ACKs for top commit:
pg156:
ACK 059f88b6a9
laanwj:
re-ACK 059f88b6a9
Tree-SHA512: f27d53ac34b93a304ef5668701ed2b5c986a926bc8ad0df4de89695fc9e1df26acb008611451319ea897658acd9c56c6a0555d60359960c9cd28238ebefa2d50
2f9515f37a rpc: move fees object to match help (josibake)
07ade7db8f doc: add release note for fee field deprecation (josibake)
2ee406ce3e test: add functional test for deprecatedrpc=fees (josibake)
35d928c632 rpc: deprecate fee fields from mempool entries (josibake)
Pull request description:
per #22682 , top level fee fields for mempool entries have been deprecated since 0.17 but are still returned. this PR properly deprecates them so that they are no longer returned unless `-deprecatedrpc=fees` is passed.
the first commit takes care of deprecation and also updates `test/functional/mempool_packages.py` to only use the `fees` object. the second commit adds a new functional test for `-deprecatedrpc=fees`
closes#22682
## questions for the reviewer
* `-deprecatedrpc=fees` made the most sense to me, but happy to change if there is a name that makes more sense
* #22682 seems to indicate that after some period of time, the fields will be removed all together. if we have a rough idea of when this will be, i can add a `TODO: fully remove in vXX` comment to `entryToJSON`
## testing
to get started on testing, compile, run the tests, and start your node with the deprecated rpcs flag:
```bash
./src/bitcoind -daemon -deprecatedrpc=fees
```
you should see entries with the deprecated fields like so:
```json
{
"<txid>": {
"fees": {
"base": 0.00000671,
"modified": 0.00000671,
"ancestor": 0.00000671,
"descendant": 0.00000671
},
"fee": 0.00000671,
"modifiedfee": 0.00000671,
"descendantfees": 671,
"ancestorfees": 671,
"vsize": 144,
"weight": 573,
...
},
```
you can also check `getmempoolentry` using any of the txid's from the output above.
next start the node without the deprecated flag, repeat the commands from above and verify that the deprecated fields are no longer present at the top level, but present in the "fees" object
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK 2f9515f37a
glozow:
utACK 2f9515f37a
Tree-SHA512: b175f4d39d26d96dc5bae26717d3ccfa5842d98ab402065880bfdcf4921b14ca692a8919fe4e9969acbb5c4d6e6d07dd6462a7e0a0a7342556279b381e1a004e
5c34507ecb core_write: Rename calculate_fee to have_undo for clarity (fyquah)
8edf6204a8 release-notes: Add release note about getblock verbosity level 3. (fyquah)
459104b2aa rest: Add test for prevout fields in getblock (fyquah)
4330af6f72 rpc: Add test for level 3 verbosity getblock rpc call. (fyquah)
51dbc167e9 rpc: Add level 3 verbosity to getblock RPC call. (fyquah)
3cc95345ca rpc: Replace boolean argument for tx details with enum class. (fyquah)
Pull request description:
Author of #21245 expressed [time issues](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-902332088) in the original PR. Given that #21245 has received a lot of review*, I have decided to open this new pull request with [modifications required to get ACK from luke-jr ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-905150806) and a few nits of mine.
### Original PR description
> Display the prevout in transaction inputs when calling getblock level 3 verbosity. This PR affects the existing `/rest/block` API by adding a `prevout` fields to tx inputs. This is mentioned in the change to the release notes.
>
> I added some functional tests that
>
> * checks that the RPC call still works when TxUndo can't be found
>
> * Doesn't display the "value" or "scriptPubKey" of the previous output when at a lower verbosity level
>
>
> This "completes" the issue #18771
### Possible improvements
* b0bf4f255f - I can include even this commit to this PR if deemed useful or I can leave it for a follow-up PR. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21245#issuecomment-894853784 for more context.
### Examples
Examples of the `getblock` output with various verbose levels. Note that `000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5` contains only 2 transactions.
#### Verbose level 0
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 0
```
##### Verbose level 1
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 1
```
##### Verbose level 2
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 2
```
##### Verbose level 3
```bash
./bitcoin-cli -testnet getblock 000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5 3
```
#### REST
```bash
curl -H "content-type:text/plain;" http://127.0.0.1:18332/rest/block/000000000000001f682b188971cc1a121546be4e9d5baf22934fdc7f538288d5.json
```
<sub>* ... and my everyday obsessive checking of my email inbox whether the PR moves forward.</sub>
Edit laanwj: Removed at symbol from message, and large example output to prevent it from all ending up in the commit message.
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
ACK 5c34507ecb
meshcollider:
utACK 5c34507ecb
theStack:
ACK 5c34507ecb👘
promag:
Concept ACK 5c34507ecb
Tree-SHA512: bbff120d8fd76e617b723b102b0c606e0d8eb27f21c631d5f4cdab0892137c4bc7c65b1df144993405f942c91be47a26e80480102af55bff22621c19f518aea3
