Reverted "Fixed #36620 -- Added coverage workflow to summarize coverage in pull requests."

This reverts commit a89183e638.
This commit is contained in:
Natalia
2025-11-25 16:04:06 -03:00
committed by Jacob Walls
parent d62e811acf
commit e4c4a178aa
4 changed files with 0 additions and 151 deletions

View File

@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
name: Coverage
on:
pull_request_target:
paths:
- 'django/**/*.py'
- 'tests/**/*.py'
branches:
- main
concurrency:
group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
cancel-in-progress: true
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
jobs:
diff-coverage:
if: github.repository == 'django/django'
name: Diff Coverage (Windows)
runs-on: windows-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout
uses: actions/checkout@v5
with:
fetch-depth: 0
persist-credentials: false
- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@v6
with:
python-version: '3.14'
cache: 'pip'
cache-dependency-path: 'tests/requirements/py3.txt'
- name: Install dependencies
run: |
python -m pip install --upgrade pip wheel
python -m pip install -r tests/requirements/py3.txt -e .
python -m pip install 'coverage[toml]' diff-cover
- name: Run tests with coverage
env:
PYTHONPATH: ${{ github.workspace }}/tests
COVERAGE_PROCESS_START: ${{ github.workspace }}/tests/.coveragerc
RUNTESTS_DIR: ${{ github.workspace }}/tests
run: |
python -Wall tests/runtests.py -v2
- name: Generate coverage report
if: success()
env:
COVERAGE_RCFILE: ${{ github.workspace }}/tests/.coveragerc
RUNTESTS_DIR: ${{ github.workspace }}/tests
run: |
python -m coverage combine
python -m coverage report --show-missing
python -m coverage xml -o tests/coverage.xml
- name: Run diff-cover
if: success()
run: |
if (Test-Path 'tests/coverage.xml') {
diff-cover tests/coverage.xml --compare-branch=origin/main --fail-under=0 > tests/diff-cover-report.md
} else {
Set-Content -Path tests/diff-cover-report.md -Value 'No coverage.xml found; skipping diff-cover.'
}
- name: Post/update PR comment
if: success()
uses: actions/github-script@v8
with:
script: |
const fs = require('fs');
const reportPath = 'tests/diff-cover-report.md';
let body = 'No coverage data available.';
if (fs.existsSync(reportPath)) {
body = fs.readFileSync(reportPath, 'utf8');
}
const commentBody = '### 📊 Coverage Report for Changed Files\n\n```\n' + body + '\n```\n\n**Note:** Missing lines are warnings only. Some lines may not be covered by SQLite tests as they are database-specific.\n\nFor more information about code coverage on pull requests, see the [contributing documentation](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/contributing/writing-code/unit-tests/#code-coverage-on-pull-requests).';
const { data: comments } = await github.rest.issues.listComments({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.issue.number,
});
for (const c of comments) {
if ((c.body || '').includes('📊 Coverage Report for Changed Files')) {
await github.rest.issues.deleteComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
comment_id: c.id,
});
}
}
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.issue.number,
body: commentBody,
});

View File

@@ -438,9 +438,6 @@ All code changes
* If the change is backwards incompatible in any way, is there a note
in the release notes (``docs/releases/A.B.txt``)?
* Is Django's test suite passing?
* If there is a :ref:`code coverage report <code-coverage-on-pull-requests>`
comment on the pull request, have you reviewed the missing coverage in
context (considering database/platform-specific limitations)?
* If the change affects the Django admin or rendered HTML output, has
:ref:`accessibility testing <accessibility-testing-baseline>` been done?

View File

@@ -394,49 +394,6 @@ settings file defines ``coverage_html`` as the output directory for the report
and also excludes several directories not relevant to the results
(test code or external code included in Django).
.. _code-coverage-on-pull-requests:
Code coverage on pull requests
------------------------------
Django's continuous integration (CI) system automatically runs code coverage
analysis on pull requests and posts a comment with a diff coverage report. This
helps reviewers see which lines in the changed code are covered by tests.
**What the coverage report shows:**
The coverage report posted on pull requests uses `diff-cover`_ to analyze only
the lines that were changed or added in the PR. It shows:
* Lines that are covered by tests (✓)
* Lines that are not covered by tests (✗)
* Lines that cannot be covered (e.g., comments, blank lines)
.. _diff-cover: https://github.com/Bachmann1234/diff_cover
**Important limitations:**
When reviewing coverage reports on pull requests, keep these limitations in
mind:
* **Database-specific code:** The CI coverage job runs tests using SQLite on
Windows. Code paths specific to other databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle)
will appear as "not covered" even if database-specific tests exist. This is
expected and acceptable.
* **Platform-specific code:** Similarly, code that only runs on certain
operating systems (Linux, macOS) will appear as not covered when run on
Windows.
* **Coverage doesn't equal quality:** A line being "covered" only means it was
executed during tests. It doesn't guarantee the line is well-tested or that
all edge cases are handled. During review, assess test quality beyond just
coverage numbers.
Missing coverage should be considered a warning rather than a blocker and
should be evaluated in context.
.. _contrib-apps:
Contrib apps

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
rules:
dangerous-triggers:
ignore:
- coverage.yml
- labels.yml
- new_contributor_pr.yml
unpinned-uses: